I have problems to get Shared Add-in done with VS2005 ("final" version) with Word 2003. I manage to make same test with old VS2003 shared add-in project type and it's working fine with Word 2000.
Is there some issues why .Net 2.0 Shared Add-in won't work with Office 2003 Also what I actually trying to solve is that I need add-in or way to add new command bar to Word where users can use my .Net windows form program. On VS2003 it worked just as I though with Shared Add-in project.
If I need to make this kind of 'add-in' for .Net 2.0 and Word 2003 should I install VSTO for this purpose or should shared COM Add-in method work
I have registery keys on registery for this but for reason or another it just won't load it. Also is it normal that if trying to manually open that add-in from Tools->Com Add-ins Word claims that it is not valid...sounds weird.
Anyone manage to do Shared Add-in project for Word 2003 with VS2005 If you have example I would love to see it.
Thank you!

Shared Add-In VS2005
MarkFahey
slothmo
http://lab.msdn.microsoft.com/productfeedback/viewfeedback.aspx feedbackid=e4514a72-3352-4178-8367-a277119b9ec7
dunc1107
http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/ShowPost.aspx PostID=140236&SiteID=1
hope it'll help you all
Rolf0324
Hi,
First of all thanks for the tip, the fix helped me for office version 2000 and 2003.
However, we develop a shared addin for all office versions,
and fix does not work for all version (xp), right
Anyway,
Is there a fix that can help me
regards,
Guy
Marcio Izepe
I'll withdraw that this is a bug. It was as I first assumed problem on my environment.
I did a little registry digging (for old times sake) and removed all entries related to that com entry. Then installed that add-in again with setup program and it worked. So I guess there were something wrong on registry. Tried to reproduce this problem with totally new project (myAddin3) project and couldn't.
So for all you there. If you have similar problems search your registry with regedit and remove all entries related to that COM. Then install again. It worked for me.
MatthewRoche
zorrro