The debuggee is a mixed (MFC + /clr:OldSyntax) exe. The application is linked with some assemblies (MFC extension DLL's, /clr:OldSyntax enabled)
Compiler settings: Release build, Unicode, Disable optimzation
After a breakpoint is reached, I will watch some values. Here is a look at my watch window:
+ this 0x01010a8c
+ this->Node 0x00d81718
this->Node->Name "Processor"
+ Node <undefined vaue> // Why Node is undefined
- this
+ ObjectBaseData^ 0x01010a8c
- Node 0x00d81710 // Why the addresses is not 0x00d81718
- GroupNet^ ....
+ Containers 0x00d81148 // Why the addresses are equal
+ GroupRoot 0x00d81148
...
Name {...} // I can't see the name "Processor".o

Confusion with watch values during debugging
Michel To
It really looks like you've found a bug in the product. Could you log a bug in the feedback page (http://msdn.microsoft.com/productfeedback). Make sure to put sufficient information to help the team reproduce the problem (sample project is ideal) and we will look at fixing it.
Thanks,
Kris M.
Thanks,
Deluxdecals
Here is the watch list with the type column
+ this 0x01010a8c AIS::VAC::Sys::Designer::GroupData^
+ this->Node 0x00d81718 AIS::VAC::Sys::Designer::DesignerGroup^
this->Node->Name "Processor" System::String^
+ Node <undefined vaue> AIS::VAC::Sys::Designer::DesignerGroup^
// Why Node is undefined
- this AIS::VAC::Sys::Designer::GroupData^
+ ObjectBaseData^ 0x01010a8c AIS::VAC::Sys::Designer::ObjectBaseData^
- Node 0x00d81710 AIS::VAC::Sys::Designer::DesignerGroup^
// Why the address is not 0x00d81718 (this->Node)
- GroupNet^ .... AIS::VAC::Sys::Designer::GroupNet^
+ Containers 0x00d81148 AIS::VAC::Sys::Designer::ContainerCollection^
+ GroupRoot 0x00d81148 AIS::VAC::Sys::Designer::GroupRootNet^
... // Why both addresses are equal 0x00d81148
Name {...} System::String^
// I can't see the name "Processor"
jstark
Thanks for the answer.
No, there isn't the same underlying type.
Dan Drew
Thanks,
Rune &#216;ynes
First, we have fixed some bugs since Beta 2 that would help for this scenario (pick up June/July CTP if you can to double-check). It might well be that your top complaint won't be addressed though. However, we are continuing to investigate it. Is it possible that this->Node->GroupNet->Containers and this->Node->GroupNet->GroupRoot point to the same underlying address (do they instantiate the same underlying type )
Thanks