Hi,
We are converting to sql 2005 and it appears that the spt_datatype_info table does not exist in sql 2005. I use column SQL_DATA_TYPE in code from this table.
Does anybody know what view the information that use to be in spt_datatype_info is in
Thanks

spt_datatype_info table in 2005
nono92_b
CREATE TABLE [#spt_datatype_info] (
[TYPE_NAME] [sysname] NOT NULL ,
[DATA_TYPE] [smallint] NOT NULL ,
[PRECISION] [int] NULL ,
[LITERAL_PREFIX] [varchar] (32) COLLATE Latin1_General_BIN NULL ,
[LITERAL_SUFFIX] [varchar] (32) COLLATE Latin1_General_BIN NULL ,
[CREATE_PARAMS] [varchar] (32) COLLATE Latin1_General_BIN NULL ,
[NULLABLE] [smallint] NOT NULL ,
[CASE_SENSITIVE] [smallint] NOT NULL ,
[SEARCHABLE] [smallint] NOT NULL ,
[UNSIGNED_ATTRIBUTE] [smallint] NULL ,
[MONEY] [smallint] NOT NULL ,
[AUTO_INCREMENT] [smallint] NULL ,
[LOCAL_TYPE_NAME] [sysname] NULL ,
[MINIMUM_SCALE] [smallint] NULL ,
[MAXIMUM_SCALE] [smallint] NULL ,
[SQL_DATA_TYPE] [smallint] NOT NULL ,
[SQL_DATETIME_SUB] [smallint] NULL ,
[NUM_PREC_RADIX] [int] NULL ,
[INTERVAL_PRECISION] [smallint] NULL ,
[USERTYPE] [smallint] NULL
)
INSERT #spt_datatype_info EXEC sp_datatype_info
ALTER TABLE [#spt_datatype_info] ADD [ss_dtype] [tinyint]
UPDATE #spt_datatype_info SET ss_dtype = xtype FROM systypes WHERE [name] = CASE
WHEN charindex('(', [TYPE_NAME]) > 0
THEN LEFT([TYPE_NAME], charindex('(', [TYPE_NAME])-1)
WHEN charindex(' ', [TYPE_NAME]) > 0
THEN LEFT([TYPE_NAME], charindex(' ', [TYPE_NAME])-1)
ELSE [TYPE_NAME] END
mluckham
asureus
The view is used by the ODBC client driver and is no longer exposed directly. In order to get the same information, you can use sp_datatype_info (http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms173819.aspx) which is also in SQL Server 2000. The SQL_DATA_TYPE column is the ODBC type id. If you want the SQL Server Type Id, use sys.types.
Upsetian
Mark,
I am trying
to use sp_datatype_info SP instead of spt_datatype_info. I would like to know if there is an equivalent to "ss_dtype" (from spt_datatype_info) in sp_datatype_info SP. Apparently, when this SP is created from spt_datatype_info, this field was ignored.Thanks in Advance