We are developing some in-house ERP applications, that will use an WinForms UI and an IIS-hosted Web Service. The clients will be using a wireless network that is prone to alot of interference. I wish to ensure that the request and response are not corrupted due to network interference. What would be the best way to accomplish this
I imagine some form of checksum on the SOAP messages would suffice. Is something like this built into web services via VS 2005 If not and I have to implement it myself, what would be the best way to go about accomplishing this
FYI, I am accessing the web services via a proxy class generated from wsdl.exe utility. The web services are implemented as ASMX services via the [WebMethod()] attributes in VS.

How to insulate the client from poor network reliability?
JEEA
niceguysfinishlast
CLM10270
Yes that's what I thought. Does SOAP have any mechanism to do this built-in What would be the best way to do this (this might be better answered in the Web Services forum where it was originally posted).
Sherif Allam
Qsac
I think some of this is done for you already.
as I recall from the whole OSI model and how TCP/IP works the folllowing things apply:
1) HTTP is based on TCP
2) TCP ensures that packets are delivered and will re-send packets not ack'ed by the reciver.
3) TCP / HTTP packets have seqence numbers to order them and I think they also have a checksum along with packet size and that is all at the TCP layer.
so I think you will be more concerned with losing the HTTP connection / the WiFi connection than the data beeing corrupted.
RameshPa
Alright, I'll repost a new thread in web services. One more quick question though. Would the client moving from one wireless access point zone to another cause the tcp connection to drop
_Damir_
That's what I thought too, but I have an ASP.Net web application that is occassionally receiving incomplete HTML pages from the server (only happens when accessing over the wireless network).
I am assuming this is because the TCP connection is being dropped entirely and a new connection is renegotiated. I'm thinking that when this happens TCP can no longer ensure reliable and complete delivery of the message, so that will need to be implemented at a higher level (eg. HTTP or SOAP).
If I'm wrong about this please correct me, or let me know what you would do in this scenario
Thanks,
Dylan
Oran Dennison
I think your question might be better answered in the Networking web forum, so I'm moving this thread there.
Daniel Roth